HARRISBURG – With efforts to force school districts to consolidate dead in the water, lawmakers and school leaders are turning to other avenues to achieve the same results without having to overcome public resistance.
The last push for compulsory mergers of school districts appears to have been in 2015. That year, then-state Rep. Tim Mahoney, D-Fayette County, authored legislation that would have called for replacing the existing patchwork quilt of 500 school districts with a system that created county-level school boards.
At the time, he pointed to a 2011 analysis that found that if Fayette County had moved from six school districts to one county-wide school district it would save $20 million a year. About $11 million of those savings were tied to lower personnel and administrative costs. The remaining savings was linked to functions such as lower transportation and food service costs, as well as the potential for closing school buildings.
Mahoney’s legislation attracted little support and it never moved out of the House education committee. He then lost his bid for re-election in 2016.
The episode is typical of the way school merger bills have played out over the years, said Nathan Benefield, vice president for the Commonwealth Foundation, a conservative think tank in Harrisburg. Lawmakers roll out a merger plan, it gets no traction and then the issue cools off for a few years before someone else brings it up again.
His group has been somewhat ambivalent about the issue. When then-Gov. Ed Rendell proposed slashing the number of districts from 500 to 100, the Commonwealth Foundation dismissed the ideas as “a red herring.”
Arbitrarily slashing the number of districts wouldn’t make sense if the merged districts are too big, he said.
Other research has suggested that the optimal size for cost-savings is around 3,000 but at 100 districts statewide, there would be almost 16,000 students per district, not counting students enrolled in charter schools.
'Some simple math'
The opportunity for savings cited by Mahoney seems obvious, said now-retired state Sen. John Wozniak, D-Cambria County, a long-time advocate for school mergers.
"If you just do some simple math: The average superintendent is out there making $200,000 a year plus benefits – or $150,000, $175,000 with benefits. Times 500 (districts), that's real money. Plus an assistant or two to each one. Plus a business agent,” he said. “When banks merge, you lose a CEO and you keep one CEO. The teller remains the same. But the people with the little hats in the back who do the accounting stuff, they lose their jobs because you put them together. Then you let attrition take care of this; it's a 10-year process. But just by simple math you're eliminating all of those positions."
Rather than move on Mahoney’s bill, the General Assembly in 2015 passed a resolution asking the Joint State Government Commission to come up with recommendations for how school districts can better work together, absent mergers.
That review stopped short of calling on the state to force mergers, saying that any consolidations should remain voluntary. The review did suggest that the state could provide incentives to encourage mergers.
Wozniak said it’s time for the state to move past information-gathering studies and either take action or stop pretending to explore the issue. Wozniak proposed a statewide task force be formed to produce a once-and-for-all recommendation.
"Let's either move forward with this or put it to bed. One or the other,” he said. “Instead of like, 'This should happen ...' Shoulda, coulda, woulda. Let's put some professional people on it, who truly understand – people who are for it, people who are against, people who are ambivalent – so that we have a good, objective viewpoint.”
If that group says consolidation make sense then state leaders should make “the difficult political decision” to follow through. If not, it’s probably time to move on to something else, he said.
School choice alternative
State Rep. Brad Roae, a Crawford County Republican, said while school district mergers could help control costs, significant political obstacles would have to be overcome.
Other options — such as expanding and improving school choice programs, sharing resources between districts and even hiring part-time professionals to teach courses — offer a chance at savings and might have a more realistic chance of implementation.
"Very few school districts will merge on their own," Roae said. "Mergers are possible, but only if we pass a law mandating it. Keeping the 500 school districts but linking state funding to sharing duplicative administrative positions and teachers to a more efficient model could achieve significant savings.
"If a 5,000-student school district has a superintendent there is no reason why a 3,000 student school district and a 2,000 student school district cannot share a superintendent. And a business manager, curriculum director, athletic director, Spanish teacher, etc. Salaries and benefits are about 70 percent of a school district budget so closing school buildings has minimal cost savings potential."
Roae is a supporter of school choice – allowing families to send their children to schools of their choosing – rather than consolidation as a means of reducing school costs.
"Legislators and the governor are basically throwing money at the problem of school budgets," he said.
Roae added: "We could freeze school spending at current levels and allow each student to use their share of money at the school their parents decide is best. Many church based schools with superior academic performance only spend $5,000 per student, the national average for public schools is $12,000 per student but the average public school in Pa. spends $16,000 per student. Choice would also force all schools to improve quality or risk losing students. It would be an academic win and a financial win."
Other possible solutions
The Joint State Government Commission said the state should look to ease any restrictions that prevent school districts from sharing services and explore how the state’s network of 29 intermediate units can be used to help school districts reduce costs by working together.
Mark DiRocco, executive director of the Pennsylvania Association of School Administrators, said that when he was a superintendent in the Lewisburg Area School District, his district shared a food service director with neighboring Selinsgrove Area School District.
It’s not clear how many districts have similar service-sharing arrangements.
One area that has been only the subject of a brief experiment is the idea of having a single superintendent.
The Columbia Borough School District, which was unsuccessful in finding a merger partner, had for a period used the superintendent of a neighboring school district as its top administrator. East Lancaster School District superintendent Bob Hollister served as superintendent of both ELANCO and Columbia for a year before Columbia hired its own superintendent last fall.
State Sen. Andrew Dinniman, D-Chester County, said that he plans to introduce legislation in the 2018-19 legislative session that would provide work-arounds to provide most of the gains associated with school mergers.
One bill would require smaller school districts to work with neighboring districts to merge back-room administrative functions.
He pointed to the system of intermediate units as a possible means of providing services to multiple districts.
“You don’t need to create a new structure,” he said. “I don’t think anyone has a commitment to oppose” merging administrative services they way they seem to oppose fully merging school districts. Seeking to share services would also avoid hang-ups over things like varying tax rates, he said.
A separate piece of legislation would seek to encourage school districts to more fully embrace the opportunity to use the Internet to share classroom programs. This would alleviate the disparity in the number of classes available between larger, wealthier districts and their smaller, poor neighbors, he said.
Dinniman said he’d planned to introduce the legislation this summer but didn’t when he realized there are not likely enough session days for the General Assembly to act on them this year.